This is Part 4 of the container escape telemetry series (overview). Part 1 covered isolation primitives and the eBPF observability model. Part 2 covered the lab and detection coverage matrix. Part 3 walked through per-scenario telemetry. This post is about the operational questions: how much data do these tools produce, what percentage of it matters, and which tool should you actually deploy?

This is Part 5 of the container escape telemetry series (overview). Part 1 covered isolation primitives. Part 2 covered the lab and tools. Part 3 was the per-scenario data. Part 4 covered volume, signal-to-noise, and tool selection. This post is for the practitioner who just installed one of these tools and wants to know what to do next.

This is Part 6 of the container escape telemetry series (overview). Parts 1-5 covered isolation primitives, methodology, per-scenario telemetry, production considerations, and tuning. This post takes the lab findings and pressure-tests them against a real threat actor operating in the wild right now.